Which statement about walkers versus canes is true?

• A. It is appropriate for patients with varying weight bearing levels and offers the greatest stability due to its large base of support
• B. It provides the least stability due to small base of support
• C. It is not recommended for patients with fair standing balance
• D. It is primarily used for patients who require maximum weight bearing

Answer: (A)

Walkers maximize stability by providing the largest base of support among common ambulatory devices. The frame contacts the ground over a wide area and allows the patient to push through both arms, distributing weight and aiding balance. Because of this broad base, walkers can accommodate a range of weight-bearing levels—from touch or partial weight bearing to full weight bearing—and are especially helpful for someone with balance concerns or recent surgery.

The other statements don’t fit because they describe properties not true for walkers. Saying a walker has the least stability contradicts its design for stability. Suggesting it’s not recommended for someone with fair standing balance ignores its purpose for improving balance during ambulation. Lastly, claiming walkers are primarily for those who require maximum weight bearing misstates their role; they’re used to provide support and control when weight bearing is restricted or guarded, not to maximize load.